PDA

View Full Version : Sunglasses VS Bare Eye Contact


Mata-Lećo
05-18-2009, 12:19 PM
I am not an advocate of wearing sunglasses unless it is absolutely necessary for me. Below are strictly my personal preferences - glad to hear yours too.

Working in Costa Rica where the UV index is usually 10 (on a scale from 1-11) does put a strain on my eyes at some times of the year depending upon my day. But, I do feel more comfortable WITHOUT sunglasses should certain scenarios arise. Such as:

1. Direct eye contact with a possible threat - individual(s). I have found in my travel throughout Costa Rica and Panama that bare eye contact has served me much better than the mystique of a bodyguards eyes hidden behind sunglasses. I do not at any point in time take on the face of a 'mean-looking' guy. Nor the facial expression of a confrontational individual. I simply exude complete awareness, focus and relaxed confidence - so as to project to 'would-be-evil-doers' that not only am I very much alert and ready for whatever presents itself, but my relaxed confidence reflects that I have done this thousands of times before. This type of non-confrontational outward appearance makes certain to not instigate an issue also. Furthermore, when the Principle is constantly in the company of other businessmen, conducting meetings with investors and such, this type of persona is much more appeasing.

I have seen bodyguards that feel the need to look like they have just had a very rough Colonoscopy...angry at the world! To the general public, this might seem like a scary person. But in my opinion, to the highly abled, motivated assailant - this type of bodyguard is not seen as MUCH of a threat when compared to the intelligent, focused, deeply alert and seasoned looking bodyguard.

Take for instance a pro boxer. Boxer "A" is in the corner aggressively bouncing around looking very mean and pounding his gloves together. He is doing everything he can to project the meanness of a rabid pit bull. He looks like he is experiencing a constant adrenaline dump. This morning he sprinkled PCP on his Wheaties.

NOW, to the regular attendant of the boxing fight who is unaware of the intricacies of fighting and physical battles, this would appear quite debilitating.

Boxer "B" is very calm. He is fully aware that his training regimen was highly efficient and his cardio for this fight is top notch. His stare at his opponent is one of confidence and focus. His movement is not exaggerated. There is nothing that he is doing in his corner to try to instill fear in his opponent. His training and ability will speak for themselves when necessary, just like it has in his previous fights.

To the savvy individual - Boxer "B" is actually the one that is very menacing. He is the one to be feared.

Point being: A lot or ALL of this can be conveyed with bare eye contact. I personally want to be able to have this tactic at my disposal and not have my eyes hidden behind dark sunglasses.

On the flip side, I am constantly reading individuals eyes with my own to get a taste of what their intentions might be. Their eyes, along with their gait/stride, type of shoe et cetera, are just a couple of things I start to analyze immediately.

2. Possible physical altercation where having sunglasses on could result in cuts/abrasions on the face and eyes. Also, due to different styles of glasses, this could cut down or inhibit very important peripheral view.

3. Worst case scenario - weapon deployment. My years at the range have been spent with shooting glasses on, but not sunglasses. I prefer clear lenses to the yellow shooting lenses to simulate what I actually see everyday. I belonged to an outdoor range in Texas. Some days were cloudy and some days were extremely bright. I found that it took hardly any adjustment to my eyes to be able to use my weapon in an effective manner.

One thing that some sunglasses do provide negatively for me are a bent objective. An askewed vision due to the curvature of the lenses. Some glasses being slight and some greater. In a high threat scenario where actions are coming fast and decisions are being made rapidly, I do not want to have sunglasses becoming an unwanted variable. Especially when transitioning from outside buildings to inside buildings, or bright sun to dark shade.

I do own sunglasses and wear them only when needed, which is very little. I use Oakley T-Wire w/ polarized lenses. Because they are small in size, they fit close to my eyes therefore offering me an unhampered view.

When my client is going to be traveling on foot from building to building in the San Jose Red Zones AND it is sunny outside, I will take them with me. After a few hours, I might have to wear them due to eye strain from constantly scanning and focusing...especially with the UV index being high.

It can take me only a couple of days for my eyes to acclimate, thus depend-on wearing sunglasses to the point that when NOT wearing them, my eyes are highly sensitive - sometimes taking a very long time to adjust to a normal sunny day. Other days that are exceptionally bright make it to where my eyes just WON'T adjust (this is after I have been wearing sunglasses for a few days straight).

Bottom line is, I personally do not appreciate this type of transition. And, I have had great success with bare eye contact towards questionable persons in my clients immediate vicinity which has proven to be a very positive deterrent.

Not to mention how silly it is to see a 'protective agent' wearing sunglasses indoors...can you say "Hollywood."

Nikko
08-19-2009, 11:49 PM
To me it depends on the environment; if they are not warranted then I also prefer not to wear them.

My facial expression is one of alertness but on edge; I've been told by a fellow operative...

Now I've tried to change that but have you ever tried consciously to be aware of what facial expression your portraying?
I;ve found that it detracts from the job at hand.

The feedback he gave me was that it puts the client on edge as well...

I only have the one head unfortunately....

A dilemma to be sure...

Mata-Lećo
08-20-2009, 05:57 AM
Yes, I agree. It most certainly depends on the environment.

After I wrote the original post (May 18th)...maybe, 2 months later I found myself with a heavy headache behind my eyes. I had to sport the sunglasses while driving that day which made me think about this thread in a comical fashion: Somehow, someone from socalbodyguards forum was going to catch me wearing sunglasses on a slightly OVERCAST day and call me out on it! haha.

I have never tried to be constantly consciously aware of my facial expression like what you are describing. Of course depending on the job environment, the Principal might want to embrace the fact that he has highly motivated and menacingly capable agents protecting his every breath. The fact that one of his agents has a facial expression NOT suitable for Sesame Street might be OK for that particular line of work.

I have to spend a considerable amount of time in meetings with my Client where he is meeting new investors and other business men. I could see where a strong facial expression would detract from the ambiance of the meetings or "big-business."

But in the end...who would the Principal want you to resemble?

1. A happy-go-lucky Jim Carrey?
or
2. Someone who wears most of his training/experience on his face?


Me personally, I would go with the Jessica Alba face.

Nikko
08-20-2009, 11:52 PM
Choose #2.

J Alba wasn't available....

Cheers

TTS
09-05-2009, 02:56 PM
Personally after years of wearing them in LE, tactical situations, and EP if I'm outside and the sun is out I have shades on. Creature of habit I guess.

Mata-Lećo
09-05-2009, 04:14 PM
That is absolutely understandable. :cool:

Does that mean that if something happen to your sunglasses, (lost, broken etc) that it would greatly impede your daily activities? (I am curious if I am just a Grade A sissy)

When I got accustomed to wearing sunglasses for only a few months, my eyes became SO sensitive that I found myself not being able to adjust in even a days time without them. In the end, I am the one that is going to lose. The eye strain that I go through compared to those who wear sun glasses is severe. Not to mention the "crows feet" that I am developing around my eyes. I don't notice the strain because I am used to it - but that doesn't take away from the fact that it is more than likely un-healthy for my eyes.

Local Talent
09-15-2009, 04:08 PM
A lot of very good points from all, I feel.

Indoors, shades are a no-no in my book.
Now outdoors or driving, they'll help alleviate the strain in your eyes (and surrounding muscles). If you're fatigued, your alertness level goes down. Another tool for the kit, like comfortable, non-slip shoes. :)
And, like Nikko, my stare can be unnerving when the threat level is high. Shades (again, outdoors) can then prevent me from "scaring the horses" or letting a subject know I'm watching them closely. Unnerving the client is another no-no (that I confess I've done) - we're supposed to be a reassuring presence (I try to smile a lot to compensate).
Those UC types whose eyes can record everything while appearing entirely harmless have my admiration.

At the range, I favor yellow eye protection for contrast, but at least I can use a hat with a visor for some relief from the sun.

Finally, Mata-Leao, I hear your concerns about sunglasses becoming an "unwanted variable", but like everything else I think it's about trade-offs.
Body armor is hot, security rigs slow down your draw, hats limit your field of vision, etc...
In the end, we all have to find the gear and clothing compromises that fit our personal preferences and mission requirements. Another way to say we have to find our own salvation.
Interesting discussion, regardless. :cool:

Mata-Lećo
09-16-2009, 10:32 AM
Great response Local Talent. I liked the analogies you used - and you are completely correct...with eye strain comes fatigue and ultimately lower mental focus. I feel bad when my client finds me snoozing at his office with fake eyes drawn on my eyelids with a black marker. It would help also if I wasn't a chronic sleep drooler...:D

Local Talent
09-16-2009, 12:24 PM
Hey, there! I hope you don't think I was implying anything about your abilities to remain alert at all times, sir... :p
I was simply remembering the facial cramping (I already have crow's feet...) I've personally experienced while standing post in jewelry stores, right by the window. On bright California days (can't imagine South America), it can become uncomfortable.
Day after day, it takes its toll, but shades are still a no-no indoors as we've said. Now when it was time to leave the location for an escort or delivery, you bet the shades came out.

On another note, old school as I am, I prefer to take them off when having a talk with someone. And I'm frequently irritated by agents who don't reciprocate (unless we're all posted together outdoors for a given time).

Mata-Lećo
09-16-2009, 01:16 PM
No implications taken whatsoever!

I haven't done ANYTHING long enough to use the phrase old school. So, I am still learning on every possible angle of the business. I wish I had the pleasure of working with another experienced Close Protection Agent so that my field experience would climb higher. I have only had the opportunity to work 1 evening with an experienced agent who is also an O.I.J agent here in Costa Rica. One evening is not enough to sponge up his methods. His company ran protection for Bill Gates last time he was in Costa Rica. I think it was a 10 person detail. He subsequently sold the protection company thereafter...

Where are you working at the moment Local Talent? Have you had any long term gigs or are they all short term based?

Local Talent
09-16-2009, 02:51 PM
Well, my last gig just ended after 3 months, and that explains my sudden presence here (much time on my hands)...
I try not to get involved in too many forums, but your intelligent post on sunglasses drew me in. :)

My longest assignments lasted up to 1.5-2 years at estates or high-end jewelry stores for the most part.

And although experienced, I'm very much a permanent student of our profession. Always very much behind the curve when it comes to the technological aspects of it, actually.
I hope I won't annoy you guys too much with my constant use of the words KISS or "old school"...

Mata-Lećo
09-16-2009, 04:57 PM
Oh I see. I sit in my clients office in front of his desk (facing him) against the wall and have very little to do while waiting for him. I assumed when I got the position that I would sit in front of the security monitor that had one cameras going to the security gate and buzz persons in as they come while at the office. His preference was for me to sit in the office with him and remain there during his business meetings as well. So, the office secretary was trained to identify all persons before they are allowed entry and to come speak with me when there is a stranger at the gate. Point is, I have access to my laptop at work to consolidate the time which is quite nice. He has one of those attitudes that he prefers I do something to pass the time rather than stand around or sit in a chair waiting for him. He is very thankful and cordial towards me.

Myself, I do not care for forums. I have belonged to MANY solely for the purpose of reading. I have witnessed enough keyboard arrogance and lack of objectivity to keep me from posting on the majority of them. I read in 'The Art of Executive Protection' by Robert Oatman that it is a good idea to network via Personal Protection forums, so, here I am. Happy to be in on the ground floor of the site too.

Unlike yourself, I am not experienced. So, I would be happy to see this site grow with seasoned guys with a casual openness to share.

Perfect answer too: Quote: "I'm very much a permanent student of our profession." The audacity to stop learning is just ridiculous. No matter what the subject is. I would not desire to work OR learn from any individual that ceased to grow.

By the way, thank you for the compliment in using the word "intelligent" in affiliation with one of my posts!